Hi Deco, On 11/30/06, Deco Rior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So... if Peter really wants to make his mark, can he at least try to > keep the API the same or compatible with Prototype.
The API is similar in some places but can't stay the same. I am writing a namespaced library. For example, new Insertion.Bottom(id, html) becomes FORK.Mutate.insertBottom(id, html) > After over 12 months of investment, the barrier to migrate with a > major code change to another library would be daunting. Fork probably isn't ready yet for this situation but eventually I think the work would be worth it. > In any case > it would need to be something with some muscle behind it (by that I > mean, contributers, funding, third-party certification). Perhaps one day. Not many open source software projects start with this much muscle. > No matter how good the code is, unless I have some degree of > certainty that the next version of IE will not break it we cannot > commit. I too need this code to work with IE 7. Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
