Hey, Jean-Philippe Encausse a écrit : > It seems this medthod is really time consuming compared to:
It shouldn't. It's actually as fast as it should get. The code you posted as comparison was obviously truncated, what's the full version? I suspect the real cost in it is element extension, and you're on IE... On an already-extended element, it should be very fast. Maybe there is an alternate way of achieving the overall processing you're going for (the loop, or whatever)? -- Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
