If I have [admittedly simple] code as follows:
MyClass = Class.create({
_a: false,
_ b: false,
_c: false,
initialize: function(a, b, c) {
this._a = a;
this._b = b;
this._c = c;
},
first: function(){
return this._a;
},
second: function(){
return this._b;
},
third: function(){
return this._c;
}
});
var myObj = new MyClass('A','B','C');
var myTmpl = new Template('First: #{first}, Second: #{second}, Third:
#{third}');
var myOut = myTmpl.evaluate(myObj);
Then the string value placed in myOut will not be:
"First: A, Second: B, Third: C"
but rather will be:
"First: function(){
return this._a;
}, Second: function(){
return this._b;
}, Third:function(){
return this._c;
}"
Based on the code for Template#evaluate, it would seem that the line:
return before + String(ctx);
could be replaced by:
return before + (Object.isFunction(ctx)) ? ctx.apply(object) :
String(ctx);
and produce [the/my] desired effect of rendering the return value from
the function instead of the function literal. Is there a reason why
this would not be workable, or should not be done?
Thanks in advance,
G
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
