> The problem is that the toString() operation called on an object of > type Function returns the literal string source of the function.
Unless we redefine it (which is what the previous example is about) > I'm not sure that I see where checking the type is limiting - if it is > a function, apply it with the current object; if it is not send it > through the usual interpretation. I guess it's just a matter of taste : ) Cheers, kangax --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
