Awesome, thank you, I'll use 2.1 then, and count on the after_initialize 
hook really actually being after the initializers.

Thanks for all your help, Fred.

Jonathan

Frederick Cheung wrote:
> On 11 Nov 2008, at 18:31, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> 
>> 116         load_application_initializers
>>
>> Although I guess I'm looking at 2.0RC1 there. Not familiar enough with
>> navigating svn to find the latest release, is there reason to believe
>> this has changed?
>>
> That was changed in 2.1 (which is what I looked at before i wrote my
> previous reply)
>> I guess I can monkey-patch Rails::process, with the aliasing- 
>> switcharoo
>> trick, to first call the original Rails::process, and then call my own
>> really_really_after_initializers method?
>>
> sounds reasonable if you have to.
> 
> Fred

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to