On 21 Nov 2008, at 19:22, Rick wrote:
> > Greg, > > validates_inclusion_of is looking for :in to be an enumeration. In a > simple case (one day granularity) you're asking for a list that's > 365.25 * 200 => 73050 items long. > ranges are enumerable and ruby is smart enough to keep it as a range, eg r = (-1000000000..1000000000) does not create a 2 billion element array Fred > My guess is it's a good thing it didn't work ;-) > > Maybe you want to go for a min/max check here. > > Rick > > On Nov 20, 11:22 am, "Greg Hauptmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> wondering if should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, >> :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + >> 100.years)" >> (doesn't seem to for me) >> >> i.e. should I be able to "validates_inclusion_of" to do date >> validation. >> >> ................ >> class GraphOptions < ActiveRecord::BaseWithoutTable >> column :start_date, :date >> validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - >> 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years) >> end >> ................ >> >> tks > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
