Hello Greg,
So here it is. After a couple of mail exchanges with Fred, I need to
tell you that I was wrong from the start. Your initial code as given,
validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in =>
(Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)
will work in the case where :start_date is the name of one of your
records fields and is a member of the Time class.
Sorry if my confused meander wasted too much of your time.
Thanks for your help Fred.
Rick
On Nov 22, 1:52 pm, "Greg Hauptmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> thanks - I'm specifically looking at Dates so I might stick with the
> below that seems to be working fine...
>
> errors.add('start_date', 'is not in Date format') if
> !start_date.kind_of?(Date)
>
> cheers
>
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greg - you might take a look at time_with_zone.rb in ActiveSupport -
> > I'm looking at 2.2.0 but I know it's in 2.1.2 as well.
>
> > a = Time.now
> > a.is_a?(Time) => true
> > a = "My name is Fred"
> > a.is_a?(Time) => false
>
> > Maybe closer to what you need?
>
> > Rick
>
> > On Nov 22, 1:04 am, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Right, but back to your initial question, I don't think my initial
> >> answer was even close to the mark.
>
> >> I believe the problem you're having is that the validates_inclusion is
> >> looking for an enumeration hanging off the :in. i.e. [1,2,3,4,5] or
> >> 1..5 will work but (My Name Is Frank)..(Your Name Is Louie) somehow
> >> doesn't look right, does it?
>
> >> You're doing :in => (Sun, 22 Nov 1908)..(Sun, 22 Nov 2108)
> >> which just isn't going to happen. Try converting to Julian days, that
> >> way you'll be bounded with two positive integers.
>
> >> Rick
>
> >> On Nov 21, 8:08 pm, "Greg Hauptmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > I've actually run with the following:
>
> >> > def validate
> >> > errors.add('start_date', 'is not in Date format') if
> >> > !start_date.kind_of?(Date)
> >> > errors.add('end_date', 'is not in Date format') if
> >> > !end_date.kind_of?(Date)
> >> > end
>
> >> > Its seems that the Rails controller tries to convert it to Date and
> >> > either succeeds or fails (without throwing an exception). So I just
> >> > test to see at the subsequent validate stage whether there is a Date
> >> > object or not
>
> >> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > > Greg,
>
> >> > > validates_inclusion_of is looking for :in to be an enumeration. In a
> >> > > simple case (one day granularity) you're asking for a list that's
> >> > > 365.25 * 200 => 73050 items long.
>
> >> > > My guess is it's a good thing it didn't work ;-)
>
> >> > > Maybe you want to go for a min/max check here.
>
> >> > > Rick
>
> >> > > On Nov 20, 11:22 am, "Greg Hauptmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> wondering if should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date,
> >> > >> :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)"
> >> > >> (doesn't seem to for me)
>
> >> > >> i.e. should I be able to "validates_inclusion_of" to do date
> >> > >> validation.
>
> >> > >> ................
> >> > >> class GraphOptions < ActiveRecord::BaseWithoutTable
> >> > >> column :start_date, :date
> >> > >> validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date -
> >> > >> 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)
> >> > >> end
> >> > >> ................
>
> >> > >> tks
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---