On 25 April 2012 09:50, Sergey Ezhov <[email protected]> wrote: I assume that because you're using Ruby Forum, you're not quoting. Please bear in mind that the forum is just a wrapper that some people use to hide the mailing list. For those of us who use the mailing list, un-quoted replies are barely legible.
> And how about a good documentary code and all as good documentation to > it? Of course, that's the ideal situation :-) Which of those frameworks has that? ;-) > For some reason developers of PHP weren't too lazy to create > documentation design team. Again, you're confusing "PHP" the language, with "Rails" the framework. Ruby has *very good* (in my opinion) API documentation - much better than the comment/discussion-ridden PHP documentation. Let me just let you know, in case you were assuming, I'm nothing to do with Rails - I'm just a developer like yourself. But I do wince when I read phrases like "too lazy", as that implies a concious decision - an allegation that's liable to rile some people. I'm happy to give you the benefit of the doubt, as you've said that English is not your first language (although, I think you're making a great effort if you're not using a translator *applauds*). But you haven't answered my suggestion that if you think the core team are lacking in documentation skills, could you help contribute? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
