On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Norbert Melzer <[email protected]> wrote: > Also there are other dangers. Let's assume an RSS-Feed-Gem wich depends on > Nokogiri. Also you have a rails app which depends on Nokogiri. > > Now you remove that RSS-Gem and your App suddenly stops working. Ok, that is > as easy as bundle command but creates unnecessary traffic and consumes time.
This is an extreme assumption that somehow blindly implies that dependency resolving does not and probably won't exist if this feature exists. My refute to that is: apt. Just because you remove one gem and another relies on a dependency the removed relied on does not mean you cannot resolve dependencies and figure out if it's still needed by another gem, as a matter of fact, bundler already has most of that built into it and on tap, it just needs to be reworked a bit and presto, you have an apt like resolver. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CAM5XQnyipFBMt7QnntxWB3%2BRvStRkthjSSKM1oov9mDYJhYj7g%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
