-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Am Sun, 23 Jun 2013 06:21:37 -0500 schrieb Jordon Bedwell <[email protected]>:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Norbert Melzer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Also there are other dangers. Let's assume an RSS-Feed-Gem wich > > depends on Nokogiri. Also you have a rails app which depends on > > Nokogiri. > > > > Now you remove that RSS-Gem and your App suddenly stops working. > > Ok, that is as easy as bundle command but creates unnecessary > > traffic and consumes time. > > This is an extreme assumption that somehow blindly implies that > dependency resolving does not and probably won't exist if this feature > exists. My refute to that is: apt. Just because you remove one gem > and another relies on a dependency the removed relied on does not mean > you cannot resolve dependencies and figure out if it's still needed by > another gem, as a matter of fact, bundler already has most of that > built into it and on tap, it just needs to be reworked a bit and > presto, you have an apt like resolver. > Since gem does only look at installed gems and there is no flag like apts "installed manually" and bundler does only recognize dependencies on a per project basis, my scenario is valid with the current architecture. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlHHEQkACgkQmStwlOckyZmstQEAxm1qcc6q8cvVNk24PYSshP/H Kldau4Fa03686wTVXecBALTr5zV45Qgkkxs3JytUOea/Cd0/orIG1OFq4EsbWJCc =f0Rn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/20130623171521.4ca9dd9b%40fqdn.nobbz.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
