On 5 Jan 2009, at 20:40, Tom Lobato wrote:
> > > > On 5 jan, 18:16, Frederick Cheung <[email protected]> wrote: >> roxml is trying to solve a more general problem - if you models >> aren't >> activerecord models then they are not going to have a particularly >> useful to_xml on it (the time i used it was generated xml to pass >> to a >> webservice) > > Sorry my bad english. I`m not sure if I understood your answer. > My model is activerecord based, but has just simple attributes > (strings, integers, > dates). Do you mean I don`t need ROXML in this simple case? The non- > roxml > to_xml/from_xml methods can do the job? > I would have though to_xml/from_xml would be quite enough here. Fred >> >> It's also pretty handy for parsing incoming xml. >> > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
