ok, thank you very much!! I will try it. Anyway, What are the "more general problem" you said?
On 5 jan, 19:00, Frederick Cheung <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 Jan 2009, at 20:40, Tom Lobato wrote: > > > > > > > On 5 jan, 18:16, Frederick Cheung <[email protected]> wrote: > >> roxml is trying to solve a more general problem - if you models > >> aren't > >> activerecord models then they are not going to have a particularly > >> useful to_xml on it (the time i used it was generated xml to pass > >> to a > >> webservice) > > > Sorry my bad english. I`m not sure if I understood your answer. > > My model is activerecord based, but has just simple attributes > > (strings, integers, > > dates). Do you mean I don`t need ROXML in this simple case? The non- > > roxml > > to_xml/from_xml methods can do the job? > > I would have though to_xml/from_xml would be quite enough here. > > Fred > > > > >> It's also pretty handy for parsing incoming xml. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
