When you built ruby 1.9.1 from source, did you go all the way to make
install? If so, what was the root (config --prefix=/???) that you
gave prior to the initial make?
I've found that just linking in the executable with major releases of
anything is often the shortest path to disfunction.
Here's a sequence you could use to build a parallel RoR suite.
1) Identify a new root for your RoR install suite like: /opt/RoR.
Create that directory and make yourself be owner (so you won't need to
sudo all the time).
2) In your Ruby source directory type:
2a) ./configure --prefix=/opt/RoR
2b) make
2c) make install
You'll now have /opt/RoR/bin, /opt/RoR/lib, ... with your new ruby in
place.
3) In a term window type:
3a) PATH=/opt/RoR/bin:$PATH
3b) ruby --version You should see something like:
ruby 1.9.1p0 (2009-01-30 revision 21907) [powerpc-darwin9.6.0]
3c) gem install rake rack
3d) gem install rails
Now you've got a new RoR suite that's available if your path is
modified as in step 3a, else you've got your original RoR setup
(assuming you haven't already blown it away).
Rick
On Mar 16, 4:32 pm, VS <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is definetely working with ruby 1.8.6. Here's the output using
> the old version of ruby :
> oldruby script/server
> => Booting Mongrel
> => Rails 2.3.2 application starting onhttp://0.0.0.0:3000
> => Call with -d to detach
> => Ctrl-C to shutdown server
>
> But when I try :
> ruby script/server,
> Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem
>
> Error has to do with ruby 1.9.1p0
>
> Thanks,
> -VS
>
> On Mar 16, 7:27 pm, VS <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > update: if I do "sudo gem install rails", I get :
> > Successfully installed rails-2.3.2
> > 1 gem installed
>
> > But if I do script/server: I still get:
> > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem
>
> > What am I missing ?
>
> > Thanks,
> > -VS
>
> > On Mar 16, 7:20 pm, VS <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > This might mean something... When I run 'gem install rails' as the
> > > local user( in the previous attempt I ran this as root), I get
> > > WARNING: Installing to ~/.gem since /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8 and
> > > /usr/bin aren't both writable.
> > > WARNING: You don't have /Users/vs/.gem/ruby/1.8/bin in your PATH,
> > > gem executables will not run.
>
> > > Any ideas ?
>
> > > Thank you.
> > > -VS
>
> > > On Mar 16, 7:16 pm, VS <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Thanks Greg. Here's the line from config/environment.rb
> > > > RAILS_GEM_VERSION = '2.3.2' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION
>
> > > > Any ideas ? this is driving me crazy... Everything was working under
> > > > ruby 1.8.6
>
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -VS
> > > > On Mar 16, 7:04 pm, Greg Donald <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, VS <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Yes, I get the same error on script/console. Here's my script/server
> > > > > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby
> > > > > > require File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../config/boot'
> > > > > > require 'commands/server'
>
> > > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > > -VS
>
> > > > > Looks normal to me.
>
> > > > > What RAILS_GEM_VERSION is in your config/environment.rb ?
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
