When you followed gregs advice you ended up sort of "fooling" the ruby command. now you have two of everything (2 rails gems, one under 1.8 and one under 1.9).
make sure you are calling the correct gem from the correct place. If i were you, i would uninstall one of your ruby instalations (at this point 1.8) On Mar 17, 1:19 am, VS <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Greg. > > Now when I do ruby -v, I get > ruby 1.9.1p0 (2009-01-30 revision 21907) [i386-darwin9.6.0] > > But when I run script/server in my rails directory, I get : > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. > > Any ideas ? > > Thanks so much, > -VS > > On Mar 16, 4:29 pm, Greg Donald <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM, VS <[email protected]> wrote: > > > How can I get ruby19 to replace ruby ? > > > You can create a link from the ruby19 to the current ruby. > > > `which ruby` will tell you the path to the current ruby. I'll pretend > > it said "/usr/bin/ruby". > > > Move the current ruby someplace else. > > > mv /usr/bin/ruby /some/place/else > > > `which ruby19` will tell you the path to the ruby19. > > > Add a link: > > > ln -s /path/to/ruby19 /usr/bin/ruby > > > -- > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
