Given that CakePHP is one of several PHP frameworks directly inspired by Rails, I'd say you're better off with the original... :)
Although I may be biased, as I've encountered far too much remarkably bad PHP code. --Matt Jones On Jul 23, 4:01 am, AlwaysCharging <[email protected]> wrote: > In no am I actually trying to make a digg-like site, it just serves as > a good example for this discussion. (And anyways, there's pligg, > which is an open source cms that'll install a digg-like site in a few > clicks) > > I'm actually just trying to decide which framework to use (rails or > cakephp). I know that twitter uses rails, but honestly that's the > worst website on the net. Not twitter itself, but the actual default > itself. It's almost completely useless, and something like tweetdeck > is a must. Also, I do know that hulu uses rails, and I guess if it's > good enough for a mulimillion dollar joint venture between a couple > mulitbillon dollar corporations, then it should be good enough for > me. However, digg uses php, and I wasn't sure if all the > functionality would be able to implemented using rails. > > All of the rails vs (cake)php comparisons are quite dated, and I'm > still undecided. Yeah, I know, just pick one, I probably can't go > wrong. I just don't want to find out a few months from now that I > made a mistake using rails, and have caused myself a lot more > headache. > > Any insight is greatly appreciated. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
