2009/9/3 Frederick Cheung <[email protected]>: > > > On Sep 3, 6:47 pm, zambezi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Frustrations aside I feel much better because you were spot on, Rick >> D. Responder is a model and qualifying the name resolved the >> problem. >> >> I'm still unclear as to why there was a "name clash" since there is >> only one class named Responder whether this namespace or elsewhere. >> But I greatly appreciate all of the the guidance, help and patience >> from both Ricks'. A little piece of my sanity is in debt to you. > > No, there is a Responder class that is part of Rails, and ruby's > constant lookup rules made it find the one that is hidden inside > ActionController before it found your top level one >
Responder is not on the list of problem words at http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/ReservedWords. Perhaps someone with access could add it. Colin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
