On Sep 4, 2009, at 3:33 AM, Colin Law wrote: > 2009/9/3 Frederick Cheung <[email protected]>: >> On Sep 3, 6:47 pm, zambezi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Frustrations aside I feel much better because you were spot on, Rick >>> D. Responder is a model and qualifying the name resolved the >>> problem. >>> >>> I'm still unclear as to why there was a "name clash" since there is >>> only one class named Responder whether this namespace or elsewhere. >>> But I greatly appreciate all of the the guidance, help and patience >>> from both Ricks'. A little piece of my sanity is in debt to you. >> >> No, there is a Responder class that is part of Rails, and ruby's >> constant lookup rules made it find the one that is hidden inside >> ActionController before it found your top level one >> > > Responder is not on the list of problem words at > http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/ReservedWords. Perhaps > someone with access could add it. > > Colin
Anyone who registers has "access" (but don't worry about it because I added it for you). -Rob Rob Biedenharn http://agileconsultingllc.com [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
