[email protected] wrote: > With BigTable.... I think there would be a considerable amount of re- > thinking needed to get Rails to use it effectively. > > From what I've read, Google app engine wont necessarily scale well if > you blindly attempt to use it in a similar fashion as relational > databases > > > >> GAE is not a great platform for Rails due to things like its hard 1000-file >> limit > > yeah I'm not sure about that limit.... if it's relating to project > files, that's not so bad...
Yes it is. Remember that you need to put Rails in your vendor directory to host it on GAE. That's 1556 files right there (for 2.3.4), and you're over the limit without any actual app code. Headius was only able to get Rails on GAE by removing framework files. > but I assume gernal website assets and > user content is in some way separate, or can be done through s3 etc Presumably. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
