On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser < [email protected]> wrote:
> > [email protected] wrote: > > With BigTable.... I think there would be a considerable amount of re- > > thinking needed to get Rails to use it effectively. > > > > From what I've read, Google app engine wont necessarily scale well if > > you blindly attempt to use it in a similar fashion as relational > > databases > > > > > > > >> GAE is not a great platform for Rails due to things like its hard > 1000-file limit > > > > yeah I'm not sure about that limit.... if it's relating to project > > files, that's not so bad... > > Yes it is. Remember that you need to put Rails in your vendor directory > to host it on GAE. That's 1556 files right there (for 2.3.4), and > you're over the limit without any actual app code. Headius was only > able to get Rails on GAE by removing framework files. > > You can actually package all your gems including rails into a single jar file to work around this issue. Also, Google has provided tools to simply do just that. -Conrad > > but I assume gernal website assets and > > user content is in some way separate, or can be done through s3 etc > > Presumably. > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koser > http://www.marnen.org > [email protected] > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
