Marnen Laibow-Koser had pointed out the reason. put more code at the model is best practice,but in this situation,ActiveRecord already gives you a brief solution～
your problem seems so strange....I will write codes to test it... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
