maybe you should use another method name and try again~~
On Oct 26, 1:36 pm, bonyfish choi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marnen Laibow-Koser had pointed out the reason.
> put more code at the model is best practice,but in this
> situation,ActiveRecord already gives you a brief solution～
>
> your problem seems so strange....I will write codes to test it...
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
