Robert Walker wrote: > Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: >> Robert Walker wrote: >>> Robert Walker wrote: >>> Okay, many sites, do. But, is that necessary in many of those cases? >>> It's more likely that a small bit of HTML needs to be added to the DOM. >> >> True, perhaps. But the OP didn't say that that was the case... > > So you mean to say, "Turn off my brain and answer the exact question > asked?" Even if that direct answer can lead to a bad user experience.
No, I just mean that we don't really know what the use case is. > > I hate when I'm reading something on a web page, it refreshes and then > have to go back and figure out where I left off. That would be annoying indeed. > This is why I didn't > mention the meta refresh method. I'm fully aware of it, but I avoid it > like I would the plague. Whereas I'd use it in preference to the JS, because it's more reliably guaranteed to work. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
