Steve Ross wrote: > On Feb 7, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Mat Brown wrote: >> So I'm looking for feedback from the group on that idea. Some >> But native implementations are probably only useful for methods that >> people as possible involved. But for now, I'd appreciate any feedback >> Looking forward to thoughts, comments, criticism, stinging insults, >> etc. if you've got 'em. >> >> Mat > > > This looks great, but have you considered the complexities of i8n on a > native implementation?
How much does ActiveSupport have to do with I18N anyway? (OK, I'll admit it: I hate Rails' I18N, and I think it was a mistake. I use FastGettext for I18N, and I don't like how it can't be used for AR errors easily. The I18N-agnostic 2.2 was easier to deal with. It will be interesting to see how 3 handles this.) Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
