On Feb 7, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > Steve Ross wrote: >> On Feb 7, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Mat Brown wrote: >>> So I'm looking for feedback from the group on that idea. Some >>> But native implementations are probably only useful for methods that >>> people as possible involved. But for now, I'd appreciate any feedback >>> Looking forward to thoughts, comments, criticism, stinging insults, >>> etc. if you've got 'em. >>> >>> Mat >> >> >> This looks great, but have you considered the complexities of i8n on a >> native implementation? > > How much does ActiveSupport have to do with I18N anyway? (OK, I'll > admit it: I hate Rails' I18N, and I think it was a mistake. I use > FastGettext for I18N, and I don't like how it can't be used for AR > errors easily. The I18N-agnostic 2.2 was easier to deal with. It will > be interesting to see how 3 handles this.) > > Best,
Well, lots. Look at Mat's prototype implementation and the ramifications will become immediately apparent. --steve -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
