On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Daniel Guettler
<[email protected]>wrote:

> So to solve this, the reason why this ends up using :method => :put is
> the following code in "apply_form_for_options!":
>
>        html_options =
>          if object.respond_to?(:new_record?) && object.new_record?
>            { :class  => dom_class(object, :new),  :id =>
> dom_id(object), :method => :post }
>          else
>            { :class  => dom_class(object, :edit), :id =>
> dom_id(object, :edit), :method => :put }
>          end
>
>
Yes, this is basic Rails.  PUT HTTP verb translates to an update action.

-Conrad


> which means for every object not responding to new_record? it will
> automatically set the method to PUT
> since the options are reverse merged later with the provided options
> this can be avoided by setting explicit :html => { :method => :post }
> in form_for - not sure though if this is entended behavior...
>
> If someone has some inside view comments would be appreciated...
>
> On Feb 20, 7:24 pm, Daniel Guettler <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Ok what is really happening here is that for_for(Session.new, :url =>
> > login_path) includes a hidden input field setting _method to put which
> > correctly complains about a routing error since no route is defined
> > for PUT /login
> > Remaining question to me is why does form_for set the method to PUT
> >
> > Session.new.new_record? => NoMethodError
> > Session.new.id => nil
> >
> > On Feb 20, 7:17 pm, Daniel Guettler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > ah the last bit of the previous message should have not been in there,
> > > but should have been in this message.
> >
> > > Changing the Session class to:
> >
> > > class Session < ActiveRecord::Base
> > > end
> >
> > > and adding a table to the database (which is not the goal here just a
> > > workaround for figuring out what's going on here) makes the everything
> > > work correctly with:
> >
> > > form_for(Session.new, :url => login_path)
> >
> > > This clearly shouldn't be related but this is what I have so far...
> >
> > > On Feb 20, 7:11 pm, Daniel Guettler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > not quite the routes you are providing are not equivalent to what I
> > > > wanted to archive and they are the only routes in the routing file
> for
> > > > this test. What I want is:
> >
> > > > GET /login should be resolved to session#new
> > > > POST /login should be resolved to session#create
> >
> > > > possible ways of doing so are according to the action_dispatch/
> > > > routing.rb file
> >
> > > > get 'login' => 'session#new'
> > > > post 'login' => 'session#create', :as => :login
> >
> > > > or when using match
> >
> > > > match 'login' => 'session#new', :via => :get
> > > > match 'login' => 'session#create', :via => :post
> >
> > > > the above two examples are equivalent since get and post just add
> > > > the :via => :method to the options and call match
> >
> > > > class Session < ActiveRecord::Base
> > > >   # include ActiveModel::Validations
> >
> > > >   attr_accessor :login, :password #, :id
> >
> > > > end
> >
> > > > On Feb 20, 7:02 pm, Conrad Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Conrad Taylor <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Daniel Guettler <
> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> Hi, I just ran into this ActionController::RoutingError and just
> > > > > >> wanted to check if someone can confirm this as a bug in the
> Rails 3
> > > > > >> beta gem.
> >
> > > > > >> config/routes.rb contains:
> >
> > > > > >>  get   'login'     => 'session#new'
> > > > > >>  post  'login'     => 'session#create',  :as => :login
> >
> > > > > > Daniel, can you post the complete route?  The 'get' and 'post'
> HTTP verbs
> > > > > > should exist within a member or collection block of a resource
> block.  For
> > > > > > example,
> >
> > > > > > resources :posts do
> > > > > >    collection do
> > > > > >       get :search
> > > > > >    end
> > > > > > end
> >
> > > > > > or
> >
> > > > > > resources :posts do
> > > > > >   get :search, :on => :collection
> > > > > > end
> >
> > > > > > Note:  both of the examples are equivalent.
> >
> > > > > > Next, your routes look ambiguous meaning that you could have
> easily
> > > > > > implemented this as follows:
> >
> > > > > > match 'login' => "user_sessions#lnew",     :as => :login
> >
> > > > > Correction:  match 'login' => "user_sessions#new",     :as =>
> :login
> >
> > > > > > match 'login' => "user_sessions#destroy", :as => :logout
> >
> > > > > > Lastly, your URLs will look like the following:
> >
> > > > > >http://localhost:3000/logout
> > > > > >http://localhost:3000/login
> >
> > > > > > Good luck,
> >
> > > > > > -Conrad
> >
> > > > > >> GET /login works fine:
> >
> > > > > >> Started GET "/login" for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-02-20 17:45:49
> > > > > >>  SQL (0.3ms)  SET SQL_AUTO_IS_NULL=0
> > > > > >>  Processing by SessionController#new as HTML
> > > > > >> Rendered session/new.html.haml within
> layouts/application.html.haml
> > > > > >> (77.9ms)
> > > > > >> Completed in 85ms (Views: 84.1ms | ActiveRecord: 0.2ms) with 200
> >
> > > > > >> However POST /login gives the following error:
> >
> > > > > >> Started POST "/login" for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-02-20 17:45:58
> > > > > >>  SQL (0.3ms)  SET SQL_AUTO_IS_NULL=0
> >
> > > > > >> ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches "/login"):
> >
> > > > > >> rake routes returns the expected urls:
> >
> > > > > >>       login POST   /login
> > > > > >> {:controller=>"session", :action=>"create"}
> > > > > >>             GET    /login
> > > > > >> {:controller=>"session", :action=>"new"}
> >
> > > > > >> Thanks, Daniel
> >
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups
> > > > > >> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > >> [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]><rubyonrails-talk%2Bunsubscrib
> [email protected]>
> > > > > >> .
> > > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to