I don't think Ruby 1.9 is ready for production. Neither do @wycats http://twitter.com/wycats/status/13314233693
And, I guess, making a project on Rails 3 is risky too. Too many bugs for now On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Conrad Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 3, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Matt Slay <[email protected]> wrote: > > What version of Ruby does or will Rails 3 require? >> > > Matt, Rails 3 requires Ruby 1.8.7 at the absolute minimum but works best > with Ruby 1.9.2. > > Good luck, > > -Conrad > > > -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
