On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]>wrote:
> Vladimir Rybas wrote: > > I don't think Ruby 1.9 is ready for production. Neither do @wycats > > http://twitter.com/wycats/status/13314233693 > > That tweet refers to 1.9.1, and implies that 1.9.2 is ready for > production. > > I'd like to know what Yehuda meant, though. Lots of people have been > using 1.9.1 for quite a while. > > Marnen, I have also been using 1.9.1 for over a year and the Rails core team recommends Ruby 1.9.2. Thus, I have recently started using Ruby 1.9.2 with Rails 2.3.5 on a new project for the last 2 months. I must say that things look very very good. Also, this will make it much easier to migrate to Rails 3.0 when it's ready and gem dependencies are met for the application. -Conrad > > > > And, I guess, making a project on Rails 3 is risky too. Too many bugs > > for > > now > > Yeah. It *is* prerelease software. > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koser > http://www.marnen.org > [email protected] > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
