Hi Colin, > I think Toyota may be an better comparison.
Good point. BTW, I started to employ unit-tests. You and Marnen have beaten me into submission :-) Sincere best wishes, Richard On May 16, 3:29 am, Colin Law <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16 May 2010 01:59, RichardOnRails > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > >> do you really want to work for clients who don't > >> understand the importance of doing it right? > > > Absolutely! First of all they paid me well. And if you've got kids to > > feed or a mortgagee to repay, that's important. Secondly, clients > > asked me to produce or modify code quickly, and they have a right to > > buy Volkswagen code rather than Cadillac code, as do buyers for > > cars. > > I think Volkswagen is a poor analogy. They may be basic cars but have > a reputation for high reliability. I think Toyota may be an better > comparison. > > Colin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
