Hi Marnen, > Glad to hear it!
Yes, but I already have a problem (posted on a new thread) and an observation: Ruby unit-test is an example of brittle software. The first one I wrote had all sorts of problems I could resolve. I wound up taking a working sample and step-by-step transforming into my desired test. If I have too many disappointments, I'll try out BDD to see if it's any better. Best wishes,] Richard On May 16, 11:37 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote: > RichardOnRails wrote: > > Hi Colin, > > >> I think Toyota may be an better comparison. > > > Good point. > > > BTW, I started to employ unit-tests. You and Marnen have beaten me > > into submission :-) > > Glad to hear it! > > > Sincere best wishes, > > Richard > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org > [email protected] > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
