Colin Law wrote:
> On 17 August 2010 14:48, Hemant Bhargava <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hope you people got it right.. :)
>
> So are you asking the question is there a better way do define the
> route for create_req rather than specifying it as you have above? I
> don't see how it could be much more concise.
Yeah i asked for the better way because i have created so many pages. So
for each page i have to write it as above. I mean suppose i create 10
pages then each time i have to write as:
map.resources :resumes, :collection => { :create_req => :any,
:page1 => :any,
:page2 => :any,
...................
...................
:page10 => :any }
So the lines of code becomes large and messy as well. Is'nt there a
single/two liner for this?
>
> Colin
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
