Hemant Bhargava wrote: > Colin Law wrote: >> On 17 August 2010 14:48, Hemant Bhargava <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hope you people got it right.. :) >> >> So are you asking the question is there a better way do define the >> route for create_req rather than specifying it as you have above? I >> don't see how it could be much more concise. > > Yeah i asked for the better way because i have created so many pages. So > for each page i have to write it as above. I mean suppose i create 10 > pages then each time i have to write as: > > map.resources :resumes, :collection => { :create_req => :any, > :page1 => :any, > :page2 => :any, > ................... > ................... > :page10 => :any } > So the lines of code becomes large and messy as well. Is'nt there a > single/two liner for this?
Sort of. You probably don't want to use RESTful routing for this. Instead, you probably want something like map.connect 'resumes/:page', :controller => 'resumes', :action => 'some_action' ...and then look at params[:page] in the controller. > > >> >> Colin Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
