Franz, what you said i was doing this but it's not good performance wise as it fires 2 queries also purpose of pagination will be for toss bcoz it will load objects and then do pagination.
Colin, I am completely agree with your opinion and thinking there should be option for doing this. On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Colin Law <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18 August 2010 08:44, Franz Strebel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Sandip Ransing <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Is it possible to have two named scopes that can be joined using OR > condition. > > > > How about > > > > result = (named_scope_1 + named_scope_2).uniq > > That would loose the sort order I think, though one could always > re-sort of course. Also could one use methods such as first on the > result? Or apply another named scope to the result to further refine > it? > > Colin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- Sandip --- www.funonrails.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
