On 17 August 2010 23:02, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote: > Sandip Ransing wrote: >> Marnen thx for reply ! >> >> Actually I wanted to add "OR" condition to acts_as_mappable finders, >> So that result-set will contain my own preferences too...but now it >> looks like >> for this purpose i may either need to mess up with library of >> rails_geokit plugin >> or override source of named_scope :( > > No. Don't. It's a bad idea. It should never be necessary. Did you > read the link I posted?
Marnen, I am not sure what you are saying should never be necessary. Suppose I have named_scope_a and named_scope_b. Are you saying it should never be necessary to find the set of records that includes all those in _a and those in _b? If not that then what is the best way? To provide a new named scope for the OR condition does not seem very DRY. Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
