On 30 August 2010 18:02, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote: > Colin Law wrote: >> On 30 August 2010 16:44, Chris Mear <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> much more complex tasks but my mind seems to have gone blank and >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-b-element >>> >>> Everything old is new again. >> >> Though actually I think my use case is not such as described there, it >> being a list of column names (bold) and values, generated by a Rails >> scaffold some years ago. > > Then you absolutely should not be using <b>. Use something semantic > instead, or if your design supports it, recast the whole thing into a > <table> and use <th> and <td> (which is what I'd normally do). The > semantics are tabular, so a <table> element would be quite appropriate.
As I said before, I agree entirely. But as I also said before it is a little used admin page and so improving the aesthetics of the html is not the most important job at the moment. Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
