On 30 August 2010 21:50, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote: > Colin Law wrote: >> On 30 August 2010 18:02, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Then you absolutely should not be using <b>. �Use something semantic >>> instead, or if your design supports it, recast the whole thing into a >>> <table> and use <th> and <td> (which is what I'd normally do). �The >>> semantics are tabular, so a <table> element would be quite appropriate. >> >> As I said before, I agree entirely. But as I also said before it is a >> little used admin page and so improving the aesthetics of the html is >> not the most important job at the moment. >> > > I quite understand that, though at the same time I like to take a "fix > broken windows" approach -- that is, I like to fix obvious small > problems if I'm working on the file anyway. >
Agreed again, I am not actually modifying that page, just adding a test for a special case. Cheers Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
