On 13 October 2010 14:51, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote: > Msan Msan wrote in post #949798: >> On 13 October 2010 04:11, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Msan Msan wrote in post #949644: >>>> I've to make an application to monitor the installation and >>>> replacement of all the PCs in my company. >>> [...] >>>> Do you think that one type of application of this kind is suitable for >>>> the use of a finite state machine? >>> >>> Quite likely, but why do you even care at this stage? Determine how the >>> application should behave for its users before you worry about >>> implementation. >> >> Sorry but my english understanding is very bad. > > Then please improve your English, and/or find a Rails forum in a > language you understand better (several non-Engljsh Rails forums exist). > >> Can you explain better? > > What part didn't you understand? > > What I was trying to say was this: you're apparently in the early stages > of designing your application. Therefore, you need to think about user > interface now -- how the application should behave from the user's point > of view. You do not yet need to think about how the application works > internally.
I have just clear what the user interface must be and what users must do when they log in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
