Zack Nathan wrote in post #964388: [...] >> You might notice, that your current route mapping is singular, and the >> one I've suggested using is plural... > > But does that work with a singular named controller?
Why do you want a singular-named controller? Plural is the usual convention, unless you have a singular resource (in which case you need "resource", not "resources", in your routes file). Learn the Rails conventions and understand them before you try to break them. > Thanks, > > jakx12 Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
