Michael Pavling wrote in post #964391: > On 27 November 2010 23:24, Zack Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> You might notice, that your current route mapping is singular, and the >>> one I've suggested using is plural... >> >> But does that work with a singular named controller? >> Thanks, > > You don't *have* a singular named controller... and if you did why > would you be mapping resources for it?
My controller is named repository. I have the resource named repository because then I can have url like this: www.xxxx.com/repository/1/bugs/1. Is this wrong? Thanks, jakx12. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
