On 24 January 2011 21:42, Colin Law <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 January 2011 19:03, Mauro <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 24 January 2011 17:21, Colin Law <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 24 January 2011 16:04, Mauro <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On 24 January 2011 15:33, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Msan Msan wrote in post #977110: >>>>>> I have Ruser and Bag models. >>>>>> I'm using Ruser instead of User because I know "user" create problems >>>>>> with a postgresql database. >>>>> >>>>> You may "know" it, but it ain't true. I use User models in PostgreSQL >>>>> all the time. >>>> >>>> That's because rails translate User in users table. >>> >>> What do you mean by that, I do not understand. >> >> nothing important, I work with other frameworks, like grails, that do >> not pluralized >> the model name when creating the table so I used not to use "user". > > You have still not explained why you are not using a class name User > and table name users. You appeared to suggest that this is not > possible when using PostgreSQL.
I was confused thinking about grails. With rails "User" can be used, with grails don't. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
