On 24 January 2011 22:44, Peter Bell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Mauro wrote: >> I was confused thinking about grails. >> With rails "User" can be used, with grails don't. > > Why not? I have Grails apps with a User domain class that work just fine. > Although as a best practice in the Grails world you want to package your > domain classes, so it'll probably have a table like com.myco.user. > > But I've done quick demo's in Grails with an unpackaged User class with no > problem at all.
It's an OT but the name tables that grails creates are not like you said. If you create a domain class com.myco.user the table that grails create is simply user and postgres doesn't like to have a table called user. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
