On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 09:49:52AM -0400, [email protected] wrote: > I just noticed the S/O of this rule was looking lower than usual, and > checked the spam hit rates in ruleqa: > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20120908-r1382249-n/RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI/detail > > Is this a TRUSTED_NETWORKS problem?
It might also be a case of his nameserver querying dnswl.org too often. IIRC they return "high trust" replies eventually if somebody issues more queries than is acceptable for non-paying users. Regards Marc
