On 09/09/2012 03:49 PM, [email protected] wrote:
I just noticed the S/O of this rule was looking lower than usual, and checked the spam hit rates in ruleqa: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20120908-r1382249-n/RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI/detailIs this a TRUSTED_NETWORKS problem?
It's DNSWL's spam feed :) and no configure TRUSTED_NETWORKS <sigh> I'll look at it
