Spam just requires honey pots. Create a sub domain you never use otherwise and seed the domain on websites, etc. Spammers and list makers will scrape it and voila. But I am glad you have a good method for ham too. Regards, KAM
Jari Fredrisson <[email protected]> wrote: >On 25.7.2014 23:43, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> And in the grand scheme, HAM is harder to get than SPAM usually. >> > >For me, it's just the opposite. I followed Warren's advice and >subscribed to numerous Finnish ham providers, and now I get lots of >ham. >Spam is really hard to get, no matter how I try to evade ISP (more or >less transparent) spam filters. My ham is better than spam, and it >shows >in my corpus.
