On 07/25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 7/25/2014 2:45 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >On 07/25, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > >>25.07.2014, 18:58, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti: > >>>On 7/24/2014 10:25 PM, UpdatesD Cron wrote: > >>>>Exit Status 9 is not zero for do-nightly-rescore-example. > >>>Still starved > >>> > >>> HAM: 155992 (150000 required) > >>>SPAM: 73537 (150000 required) > >>>Insufficient spam corpus to generate scores; aborting. > >>>Exit Status 9 is not zero for do-nightly-rescore-example > >>> > >>> > >>How come the "Rule updates are old" message posted to "dev" says there > >>are are plenty of both HAM and SPAM? > >The short answer is because > >http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20140724 says so. Of course, > >the explanation of the difference is generally more interesting. > And which may point to where the issue is at... We need the parsing > to give us more information on a per log level so we can identify > what's going on.
I feel like this came up before, and I don't remember what happened. Could this be the result of somebody uploading after do-nightly-rescore-example runs?
