On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote: [...] > Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or are > just late. > >> SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759 >> >> New masscheck submission listings in the past day: >> 1831759 (Yes) - spam-axb-ham-misc.log (May 17 11:35) >> 1831684 (No) - ham-giovanni.log (May 17 08:38) >> 1831684 (No) - spam-llanga.log (May 17 08:45) > I takes half an hour to process my data and judging from those lines it seems that I am sending my data 3 hours before axb@, am I wrong ?
> Based on the RuleQA daterev list (at the top of the page), 1831684 *does* > appear to be a valid masscheck daterev (apologies for the textual > "screenshot"): > > > 1831684: 2018-05-16 08:34:16 > spamassassin_role: promotions validated > > 20180516-r1831684-n > axb-coi-bulk axb-generic axb-ham-misc axb-ninja darxus ena-week0 ena-week1 > ena-week2 ena-week3 ena-week4 giovanni jarif jbrooks llanga > mmiroslaw-mails-ham mmiroslaw-mails-spam sihde > > 1831684: 2018-05-16 08:34:16 > spamassassin_role: promotions validated > > 20180517-r1831684-n > giovanni llanga > > 1831759: 2018-05-17 08:34:10 > spamassassin_role: promotions validated > > 20180517-r1831759-n (Viewing) > axb-coi-bulk axb-generic axb-ham-misc axb-ninja darxus ena-week0 ena-week1 > ena-week3 ena-week4 grenier jarif jbrooks mmiroslaw-mails-ham > mmiroslaw-mails-spam sihde thendrikx > > > You don't see that normally because the default "last two" in the UI is > usually the current submissions from everybody else, preceded by the > apparently-late submission for the *prior* rdaterev from from giovanni and > llanga. You have to hit "all daterevs within 2 days" to see more history. > > > It looks to me like their submissions are for the correct (prior) daterev > (SVN commit) but are coming in ~20H late... I don't think we can tweak the > cutoff *that* much. :) > > I would be surprised if their masschecks were taking that long to complete. > Is it possible they have something like a TZ error causing that much of a > discrepancy? > >
