On 05/22/2018 04:17 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or are
just late.
SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
1831759 (Yes) - spam-axb-ham-misc.log (May 17 11:35)
1831684 (No) - ham-giovanni.log (May 17 08:38)
1831684 (No) - spam-llanga.log (May 17 08:45)
I takes half an hour to process my data and judging from those lines it seems
that I am sending my data 3 hours before axb@, am I wrong ?
The first column is the SVN tagged revision that your masscheck is
running against. The "No" means it's not matching the currently staged
rsync directory that the masscheck script pulls from.
I think you are running your masscheck too early against the previous
SVN tagged revision. I am running mine at 9:05 AM UTC. Those times
above look like yours is running an hour too early.
Dave
