There are also several people not using --all flag, so skipping all messages
over 256kB..

axb
darxus
ena
grenier
jbrooks
llanga
thendrikx

Also wasting CPU for global warming due to not using --after.  Number of
messages being too old for ruleqa to process:

ham-axb-ham-misc.log 4030
ham-thendrikx.log 600
ham-net-axb-ham-misc.log 4030
ham-net-thendrikx.log 601
spam-darxus.log 47610
spam-grenier.log 3441
spam-jbrooks.log 16105
spam-llanga.log 815
spam-net-darxus.log 47610
spam-net-grenier.log 3441
spam-net-jbrooks.log 16105
spam-net-llanga.log 815


On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:51:09PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> 
> Probably --reuse is active, it should only be used together with --net. 
> Should use latest automasscheck-minimal for consistency.
> 
> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/NightlyMassCheck
> 
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:33:54AM +0100, Paul Stead wrote:
> > Not -net log files, but tflag net rules during a nightly.
> > 
> > Here's some examples for you:
> > 
> > [1]https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190519-r1859488-n/RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE/
> > detail
> > [2]https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190519-r1859488-n/RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL/detail
> > [3]https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190519-r1859488-n/DKIMWL_BL/detail
> > [4]https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190519-r1859488-n/FROM_FMBLA_NEWDOM28/
> > detail
> > 
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 10:29, Jari Fredriksson <[5]ja...@iki.fi> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >     Paul Stead kirjoitti 16.5.2019 15:25:
> > 
> >          
> > 
> >         Also mentioned yesterday again was the jarif corpus submitting 
> > net-only
> >         rules during the nightly masscheck?
> >        
> > 
> >         Paul
> >        
> > 
> > 
> >     Someone claimed that yes, but I have verified my dailies and they do not
> >     post -net.
> >      
> >     t. jarif
> >      
> >     --
> >     [6]ja...@iki.fi
> > 
> > 
> > References:
> > 
> > [1] 
> > https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190519-r1859488-n/RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE/detail
> > [2] 
> > https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190519-r1859488-n/RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL/detail
> > [3] https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190519-r1859488-n/DKIMWL_BL/detail
> > [4] 
> > https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190519-r1859488-n/FROM_FMBLA_NEWDOM28/detail
> > [5] mailto:ja...@iki.fi
> > [6] mailto:ja...@iki.fi

Reply via email to