quartz should be an optional jar only needed if you wish to adapt existing quartz calendars. Otherwise you can just write your own calendars against our own interface.
Mark On 07/03/2012 09:41, Wolfgang Laun wrote: > Is there a standard procedure for Drools releases, regulating whether > they contain 3rd party jars that are essential for core (!) functions > of Drools? > > For example: After downloading and installing 5.3.0, I tried to use a > rule calendar, but there's no "quartz" to be found in all the *.jar > files in /drools-distribution-5.3.0.Final/binaries. > > Downloading quartz is no problem, but it would be NICE if there were a > hint in the ReadMeDrools.txt. (And what else is required but not > included?) > > -W > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
