On 07/03/2012, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: > quartz should be an optional jar only needed if you wish to adapt > existing quartz calendars. Otherwise you can just write your own > calendars against our own interface.
Well, put this and the (up-to-date) URL for downloading quartz into the readme - that's all I wanted to suggest. -W > > Mark > On 07/03/2012 09:41, Wolfgang Laun wrote: >> Is there a standard procedure for Drools releases, regulating whether >> they contain 3rd party jars that are essential for core (!) functions >> of Drools? >> >> For example: After downloading and installing 5.3.0, I tried to use a >> rule calendar, but there's no "quartz" to be found in all the *.jar >> files in /drools-distribution-5.3.0.Final/binaries. >> >> Downloading quartz is no problem, but it would be NICE if there were a >> hint in the ReadMeDrools.txt. (And what else is required but not >> included?) >> >> -W >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
