On 27/03/2012 10:02, Wolfgang Laun wrote: > I've collected a few things I've been moaning about... They are > intended to make DRL programming more convenient, given the current > set of the Engine's capabilities, i.e., enhance Drools' usability! > > AFAIK, none of these proposals would break backward compatibility. Feel free to start a new wiki page to collect your own ideas.
Mark > > Cheers > Wolfgang > > > On 27/03/2012, Mark Proctor<mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: >> I've put up a wiki page to collect thoughts on ideas that would involve >> breaking backwards compatability in Drools. It's aimed to produce ideas >> for Drools 6.0. >> >> No suggestion is too silly, think of it as a brainstorming area for >> alternative syntaxes and behaviours to what we have now, so knock >> yourself out. >> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/BreakingChangesSuggestions >> >> Mark >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
